Chris Brannon's Blog rss

Hey-Hi (AI) Isn't Your Friend or Lover or Partner in Crime

A friend of mine visited recently, and he was showing us Musk’s Grok on his phone. Yes, eww yuck, I detest Eugenics Boy, government wrecker, swasticar salesman, and public Nazi saluter Elon Musk, so I’d never use this thing, let alone pay for it. For that matter, I won’t use or pay for Chat GPT, Claud, or any of the rest, because I think this shit’s stupid, just more surveillance in different clothing, wasteful, overhyped, too centralized in the hands of the oligarchy, and so forth. Anyhow, my friend was demonstrating it for us, and at some point, he mentioned its “personality.”

I nearly blew a gasket. No, no, no! This thing is basically a read-eval-print loop, where the reader reads English queries and statements, the printer responds with English statements, and the evaluator is some huge pile of complexity including neural nets, statistical models, and a bunch of other things I am too dumb and too sick to understand. It doesn’t think; it makes statistical predictions based on past input and training. To invert Descartes famous statement “I think, therefore I am”: “It doesn’t think, therefore it isn’t.” It has no ego. It cannot feel emotions either, so if it expresses them, they are just fake and based on mathematical models and statistical predictions. Without an ego, it cannot have a personality. I was chilled to the bone to hear my friend, who is very technically capable, anthropomorphizing it to the degree he did.

A few days later, another friend tells me that there are actually people who are “in relationships” with AI. If they can make human-like robots, probably the most popular application would be the AI-powered sex bot. I see this coming, pun not intended. Its every word, sound, or motion during the sex act will be mathematically predicted, and probably trained over time to appeal most to the owner’s particular turn-ons. Every orgasm will be fake: faker than Meg Ryan’s in When Harry Met Sally. Unlike a real partner, it won’t feel anything. It won’t care about you, because it is incapable of caring. It won’t be with you through thick and thin, because as soon as you can no longer afford its monthly subscription, it will just be a lump of simulated flesh. A relationship with this thing will be about as fulfilling as a parasocial relationship with some camgirl on Only Fans.

One wonders what the subscription model for this thing will look like, because as surely as the sun rises, there will be one. Is there an ad tier and a premium tier? If you can only afford the ad tier, then foreplay is basically listening to it read off ads and try to sell you shit you don’t need. Will there be subscriptions that limit the kind of sex acts you can perform with it? Will there be jailbreaks of the AI prompt? Imagine a world in which your friend tells you that he got his artificially-limited sex bot to give him anal using some tricky prompt engineering.

Don’t forget that everything will be recorded and sent to the manufacturer. It will give those companies deep insight into your most intimate activities and communications. Your sexual behavior will be used to train future versions of the AI.

Due to tech’s penchant for overpromising and underdelivering, I cannot say for sure that Stepford wives / husbands are coming. If they are, it won’t be sexually – unless you count fakes – but they will have a subscription model and lots of yummy surveillance features.

While I’m on the topic of Seig Heilin’ Eugenics Boy Elon Musk, why does this little freak have to ruin things by naming his garbage after it? Examples include Tesla, starship, and now “grok”. Of course I’ve written about my campaign to eliminate the useless and now reputationally damaged letter x from the English alphabet.

One more loose thought: if you want to know all you need to know about the AI bubble or crypto ponzi schemes, I’d suggest the 1841 book Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowds.

Posted 29 Apr 2025 09:34 by chris Updated: 29 Apr 2025 09:38
Tagged: AI culture tech world-going-to-shit

That Time I Was Cheering for Team Tsunami

Remember a few months ago when a 7.6 magnitude earthquake struck in the waters near northern California? This was in mid-late December, I think. For a brief time, no more than thirty minutes to an hour, there was a tsunami warning for the area. Care to guess what was going through my head? “Please, please, please let it take out Silicon Valley.”

To my mind, Silicon Valley is basically the modern equivalent of Sodom and Gomorrah, and I ain’t talking about homosexuals or sex of any sort at all. For what it’s worth, the mythical Sodom and Gomorrah weren’t wiped out for sexual practices either; they were destroyed because of how they treated strangers and the poor. Silicon Valley is the source of the wealth of most of today’s oligarchs. It is where the surveillance panopticon is built. It is the source of the insurgent wealth that is destroying the USA right now: the same insurgent wealth that is a clear and present danger to the world. Like all of the evil cities that preceded it, such as Nineveh, or Babylon, or Rome, Silicon Valley’s days are numbered. Woe betide it, for someday, all will curse it, and it shall be called Silicon Desolation.

Addendum: Insurgent Wealth

I think I may have coined a new phrase in this post: insurgent wealth. This is the wealth of oligarchs, the wealth that is powering a fascist insurgency at the highest levels of the US government. I couldn’t think of a better phrase. Anyway, it is what you get when massive wealth inequality is weaponized against the institutions that ar, in theory, intended to serve the people.

Posted 10 Mar 2025 16:20 by chris Updated: 10 Mar 2025 21:52
Tagged: culture

Does Anyone Remember that Time the Right Wing Sorta Invented the Trigger Warning?

Article from Wikipedia about the Infamous “Clear Channel memorandum”.

This was sent to Clear Channel stations shortly after the September 11 attacks, and it suggested songs that were not appropriate to play on the air. Read through the whole list. It’s funny as fuck, and terribly sad at the same time.

Two of the most inspiring songs of all time, Imagine by John Lennon and Get Together by the Youngbloods were on the no-play list. I want both these to be played at my memorial service.

“Everybody get together, try to love one another” wasn’t a message our corporate overlords wanted us to hear right then. It usually isn’t, unless they can turn some profit from it. After all, the 34th of the Ferengi rules of acquisition says that “war is good for business”, and the 35th says that “peace is good for business.”

Of course with George Bush II’s sycophants trying to spark off another Holy Crusade, “imagine no religion” would be off the table. Same with “brotherhood of man” and “imagine there’s no country”, and “the world shall be as one”; such incendiary lyrics! Let’s not even get started about “imagine no possessions”, while Georgie was telling everyone to go shopping.

Posted 04 Jan 2025 19:02 by chris Updated: 04 Jan 2025 19:02
Tagged: culture snowflakes

Social Justice Gone Wild

I thoroughly expect this post to get many people’s knickers in a twist. You know what? I don’t care. I may or may not have too many years to live. Do you think I am afraid of being cancelled? I’ve been an outsider all my life. I’ve been in emergency rooms with people telling me that I nearly died. That’s, like, the ultimate cancellation right there. Grim Reaper may cancel me tomorrow, forever. So read on and cancel me if you want, or agree with me. I don’t give a shit, because I live in the US and it’s a free country.

Here’s the backstory. I got permabanned for hate speech in r/politics on reddit.

The comment I was replying to

(Context: are transgender activists too strident?)

Decades ago, there was a televised Q&A with MLK, and one white woman asked MLK if he thinks that the black advocates are asking for “too much too soon” and that it’s hurting their cause.

It’s an argument as old as time. ‘Don’t ask for all of your rights at once. Can’t you just ask for SOME of them for now?’

And my response

It’s a specious argument. When MLK said those words, cops were siccing dogs on black people and beating them for peacefully protesting. You don’t negotiate with a system like that, because it very much wants to kill you and it is proving it every day.

I myself am a marginalized person. I’m blind. I have literally had a woman tell me that she would not rent to me because all she had were second story units and blind people can’t safely walk up and down a flight of stairs.

Even so, I wouldn’t dare to compare my struggle to the struggle of black people like Dr. King. Because there just ain’t no comparison between “some idiot won’t rent to me, but a bunch of other people sure will” and “police might well murder me.”

And from where I’m sitting, as a guy who knows history and has faced discrimination over the years himself, I see transgender people arguing about pronouns and bathrooms and the right of “transgender”[1] children to permanently alter their bodies, and I’m like “I can’t even.” Someone called you the wrong pronoun? Try being refused a roof over your head.

Oh and the bathroom thing? I was assaulted in a boy’s bathroom by another boy when I was 8. I don’t call it sexual assault, because there damned sure wasn’t anything sexual about it. I don’t care whether I’m in a bathroom labeled “men’s” or a bathroom labeled “women’s.” I want to be in a single-occupancy bathroom where I can do my business in privacy.

And let’s talk about women. There was a time that they couldn’t even have bank accounts. And now, they’re being told that they have to accept biologically male folks – even ones with external male reproductive organs – into their women’s only spaces? Some of them are pissed, and I don’t blame them for it.

I do not hate transgender people; I try to treat them (as individuals) with empathy. I in fact try to mind my own business. It’s a real struggle right now, the minding my own business part.

[1] I put quotes around “transgender” children because, while I know for a fact that truly transgender kids do exist, I suspect that the vast majority of them are just kids struggling to figure out who they are in this crazy world of ours.

So what’s my point?

I’m sick and tired of people being compared to Nazis or segregationists or whatever for objecting to trans women in women’s only spaces. I’m tired of it being acceptable for so-called progressives to use misogynist language against the so-called “TERF”. Trans people are not being denied the right to exist. Bull Conner isn’t siccing dogs on them or beating them with hoses or whatever. If you live in the US, you have the right to pump yourself full of opposite-sex hormones, or mutilate your wee wee, or do whatever the fuck you want to do as long as it doesn’t impinge upon others’ rights. You have the right to “identify as” however you like, and I’ll defend that right with my life if need be. You can identify as Thomas the Motherfuckin’ Choo Choo Train for all I care. I’ll even call you Tom. What you don’t have the right to do is force me to ride you around on the railroad tracks.

I guess I’d call myself a TERF, except that I don’t call myself a male feminist. “Male feminist” has always struck me as a label someone applies to himself as a cheap ploy to get pussy, and I don’t need artifice for that. So I’m a friend of TERFs.

The Backlash

I think we’ve made amazing social progress over the last century. We have the potential of making a lot more of that. But we’re at an inflection point right now. We need to fix massive wealth inequality. We need to make society work for everyone, not just pander to marginalized group du jour. We need an actual Left in the US. One that is working to ensure that no one is living hand to mouth. A Left that fights for things like affordable housing.

That’s why I voted Democrat. Not because I thought that the Harris-Walz ticket was perfect; I didn’t. I did think they were a step in the right direction and that Trump wasn’t.

Unfortunately, a good many of my fellow citizens – a majority of the voters, in fact, – thought otherwise. Because Trump was perceived as the one talking about economics, and the Democrats were perceived as the party making a big fuss about pronouns and silly neologisms like Latinx.

You know, I have a great deal of respect for Elizabeth Warren. I think she’s a smart lady with a really big heart. But the first time I heard her say “Latinx”, I was like whoa, it is going to be a real struggle for me to take you seriously now.

I’m thankful that “Filipinx” never really took off, because it sounds like a shady enlargement drug that one might buy from www.dickpillpharmacy.com.

Anyway, the digression is over; let’s go back to that inflection point I mentioned. If your first priority is making sure that people have a roof and aren’t living hand to mouth, the cultural progress is going to follow naturally. It worked during the years between 1933 and 1980. The Democratic Party has a choice. They can choose a universal message like “a chicken in every pot”, and cultural progress will be a natural consequence of that succeeding, or they can choose a message of tribalism.

But my expectation is that they won’t do the needful and we’re in for a serious backlash.

Posted 02 Dec 2024 22:48 by chris Updated: 03 Dec 2024 05:14
Tagged: culture